The fragmentation of urban green spaces causes an imbalance in the supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services (CES), which affects the ecological functions and the well-being of urban residents. Evaluating CES in urban parks is crucial for sustainable urban development. By reviewing the relevant concepts of park CES assessment, 11 types of CES functions and values, perception assessment, and supply-demand assessment perspectives were identified. The study explores four categories and 19 types of assessment methods, including direct monetary methods, indirect monetary methods, direct non-monetary methods, and indirect non-monetary methods, as well as three categories and 18 combinations of methods. The findings indicate: (1) Overall trend, the attention to park CES evaluations is increasing annually, but there needs to be more attention to CES categories and a need for more research at community and pocket parks. (2) Evaluation perspective, perception evaluations are much more focused on than value and supply-demand evaluations, resulting in limited comparability of results. (3) Evaluation methods, the trend is shifting from a single assessment model to a more diverse combination of methods, emphasizing the combination of stages to build a more efficient and flexible assessment framework and obtaining more comprehensive assessment results from multiple perspectives.