基于层次分析法的上海黄浦滨江公共空间世博段绿化景观评价分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

上海市科委科技创新行动计划课题“上海‘四化’生态空间服务功能供需评估与工程建设技术研究”(编号:19DZ1203304)


Research on Plant Landscape Evaluation of Expo Section of Shanghai Huangpu River Public Space Based on AHP Method
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    城市滨水是城市中最宝贵的生态景观资源,景观评价有利于为滨水空间景观提升提供思路和对策。根据文献调查、实践调查和专家访谈,选取代表性评价因子,以层次分析法构建适用于上海黄浦滨江公共空间世博段绿化景观的评价体系。将研究对象划分对A段、B段、C段和D段进行绿化景观评价,基于语义差异法进行问卷调查,经数据处理得到评价结果。结果评价得分均为正分,说明游客对绿化景观总体评价积极。由方差分析可知,各评价指标平均得分之间存在显著差异。其中,景观丰富度(D1)、景观独特性(D3)和空间序列韵律感(D6)三项评分显著最高,而世博文化感受度(D16)、工业元素感受度(D17)和自然科普体验度(D18)三项评分显著最低。综合评分来看,A段>B段>D段>C段,各区段的评价指标得分存在一定共性,但部分指标得分存在显著差异。经实地考察,评价得分与客观实际相符合。最后对可推广的经验和优化改进的思路进行讨论。

    Abstract:

    The urban waterfront is the city’s most valuable ecological landscape resource, and landscape evaluation is conducive to providing ideas and countermeasures for improving the waterfront space landscape. According to the literature survey, practice survey, and expert interview, representative evaluation factors are selected, and the analytic hierarchy process constructed an evaluation system suitable for the green landscape of Expo section of Shanghai Huangpu River Public Space. The study subjects were divided into A, B, C and D segments for green landscape evaluation. Based on the semantic difference method, it conducted a questionnaire survey and obtained the evaluation results through data processing. The results show that the evaluation scores are all positive, indicating that tourists’ overall evaluation of the green landscape is positive. The variance analysis showed a significant difference between the average scores of the evaluation indicators. Among them, the three scores of landscape richness (D1), landscape uniqueness (D3), and sense of the rhythm of spatial sequences (D6) were significantly the highest, while the three scores of Expo cultural sensitivity (D16), industrial element sensitivity (D17) and natural science popularization experience (D18) were significantly the lowest. From the perspective of comprehensive scoring, the A segment > the B segment> the D segment > the C segment, and the evaluation index scores of each segment have certain commonalities. Still, there are significant differences in the scores of some indicators. After field investigation, the evaluation score is consistent with the objective reality. Finally, it discussed the generalizable experiences and ideas for optimization and improvement.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-16
  • 出版日期: