In landscape space, the passage of time in one dimension leads to the weathering and degradation of three-dimensional space, forming a ruined landscape that carries spatial and temporal information. The post-industrial landscape preserves the “industrial ruins” of the industrial era. It is transformed through natural methods such as planting, thus presenting a distinct “industrial natural” dual aesthetic dimension, introducing the fantasy and ferocity of ruins and mountains, the picturesque and sublime of artificial and natural elements. This article traces the theme of ruins painting in 18th century Europe back to the ruins-oriented landscapes in picturesque gardens in England, analyzing the evolution of ruins aesthetics from painting to gardens and then to the landscape field. Through the method of comparing landscape cases with ruins paintings, explore the two temporal levels present in the ruins landscape of post-industrial landscapes: the overall perception based on the superposition and coexistence of site historical information and new information, and the continuity experience of human senses and perception in the movement through space, namely “spatiotemporal compression” and “spatiotemporal extension”. Through case interpretation and analysis of human perception and experience of landscapes in such scenes, Exploring the aesthetics of ruins in the context of the continuous evolution and renewal of post-industrial landscapes provides a new perspective for the original intent and viewpoint of post-industrial landscape design in our country, offering aesthetic guidance for post-industrial landscape design, guide post-industrial landscape design.